Clark Schaefer
Share this
Why Community Banks Can’t Afford to Cut Corners on IT Audits

Why Community Banks Can’t Afford to Cut Corners on IT Audits

Financial institutions face mounting pressure to demonstrate strong cybersecurity controls, keep sensitive data secure, and maintain operational resilience. For community and regional banks with limited staff and expanding digital footprints, IT audits are no longer a routine compliance task. They are a vital part of protecting the institution’s stability, reputation, and long-term growth.

Yet some banks unintentionally cut corners because of tight budgets, staffing shortages, or assumptions that existing processes are “good enough.” Unfortunately, examiners rarely take those constraints into account. When cybersecurity and technology audits uncover preventable gaps, the consequences can escalate quickly.

The Hidden Cost of Cutting Corners

When banks rely on outdated documentation, incomplete testing, or limited internal reviews, several risks emerge that can lead to major audit findings.

Incomplete Documentation and Change Tracking

Regulators expect documentation to reflect reality across networks, applications, and vendor relationships. Banks that bypass regular updates or rely on one-time reviews often present inconsistent or outdated information during audits. Examiners view this as a breakdown in governance.

Limited Internal Testing

Some institutions focus only on the scope of last year’s audit. This creates blind spots as new cloud services, digital banking tools, and vendor integrations are added. Without ongoing validation, banks may unknowingly operate with misconfigured permissions or outdated controls that increase cyber exposure.

Overreliance on Third Parties

Many community banks rely on vendors for core operations. Assuming that the vendor alone is responsible for security often leads to issues during audits. Examiners expect banks to verify controls independently and maintain clear oversight, regardless of the service provider.

Strained IT Staff

Small teams frequently juggle daily support, projects, patching, and audit preparation. When staff lack the bandwidth to conduct thorough reviews or track remediation, critical tasks slip through the cracks. Auditors view these gaps as systemic issues rather than situational.

What Examiners Expect Today

Auditors are assessing whether controls exist and if they work as intended. Critical focus points include:

  • Documentation that aligns with current systems and processes

  • Continuous monitoring, not once-a-year checks

  • Traceability between risks, controls, and remediation efforts

  • Clear oversight of vendors, cloud platforms, and shared responsibility models

  • Evidence that leadership understands and supports cybersecurity priorities

Banks that demonstrate these capabilities reduce the likelihood of audit findings and build trust with regulators.

Real-World Example: A Shortcut That Backfired

A community bank recently completed its annual IT audit with minimal findings. Feeling confident, the team reduced internal testing the following year to focus on a core conversion project. During the next exam, regulators discovered a misconfigured firewall rule that allowed broader network access than intended. The misconfiguration occurred months earlier when new cloud services were added. Because internal testing had been scaled back, the issue went unnoticed.

The bank spent considerable time and resources fixing the problem and addressing examiner concerns. The root cause was the decision to scale back internal review processes.

How Banks Can Strengthen Their Approach Without Straining Their Teams

Community and regional banks don’t need extensive cybersecurity departments to improve audit readiness. They need consistency, visibility, and a structured approach. Priorities include:

Regular Control Validation

Review system configurations, access controls, and critical logs more frequently to avoid surprises during audits.

Transparent Vendor Oversight

Verify controls with service providers and maintain documentation that demonstrates shared responsibility.

Current and Accurate Documentation

Keep network diagrams, policies, procedures, and inventories up to date as systems evolve.

Risk-Based Review Cycles

Align testing frequency to the areas of highest exposure rather than relying on the previous year’s audit scope.

Leadership Engagement

Ensure senior management and the board understand key risks and receive regular updates on remediation progress.

Strengthening Audit Readiness Builds Long-Term Resilience

Cutting corners may appear to save time in the short term, but it often results in larger disruptions, regulatory scrutiny, or emergency remediation work. Institutions that maintain a disciplined and proactive approach to audits gain better visibility into their risks, improve operational integrity, and build confidence with regulators and customers.

If your team is stretched thin or unsure where to start, our advisors can help you build a clear, manageable path to stronger IT audit readiness while you stay focused on daily operations.

Expert Contributors

Carly Devlin

Shareholder, Chief Information Security Officer
We're always excited to address challenges for our clients and to bring the best solutions for their situation to the table.
You may also like